Read the original article here.

---

Okay, here is the educational resource on Online Propaganda, framed within the context of "The Dead Internet Files: How Bots Silently Replaced Us."

---

Online Propaganda in the Age of Automation: An Educational Resource on The Dead Internet Files

1. Introduction: The Evolving Digital Battlefield

The internet, initially envisioned as a free and open space for information exchange, has increasingly become a battleground for influencing public opinion. Online propaganda is a significant force shaping narratives, manipulating perceptions, and impacting real-world events, from elections to public health crises.

In recent years, concerns captured by concepts like "The Dead Internet Files" suggest that a substantial and growing portion of online activity and content isn't generated by genuine human users but by automated programs, bots, and sophisticated AI systems. This shift fundamentally changes the landscape of online propaganda. Instead of relying solely on convincing human arguments, modern propaganda leverages automation to scale dissemination, create false consensus, and target individuals with unprecedented precision, contributing to a digital environment that feels increasingly artificial and manipulated.

This resource explores the nature of online propaganda, its methods, and critically, the profound impact of automation and bots – the core elements of the "Dead Internet" phenomenon – on its effectiveness and prevalence.

2. What is Online Propaganda?

Online propaganda is the dissemination of biased, misleading, or manipulative information through digital channels to influence the beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors of an audience. Its goal is not to inform neutrally, but to persuade and mobilize support for a specific agenda or cause, often by bypassing critical thinking.

Definition: Propaganda Information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.

Definition: Online Propaganda The use of digital platforms and tools, including social media, websites, forums, and automated systems, to spread propaganda.

Propaganda often plays on emotions, fears, and prejudices. While not always outright false, it frequently employs selective truths, distortions, and emotionally charged language to achieve its aims. The online environment, with its speed, reach, and potential for anonymity, offers fertile ground for its spread.

3. Methods and Tactics of Online Propaganda

Online propaganda employs a diverse toolkit of methods, many of which are significantly amplified by automation:

3.1. Fake Accounts and Sockpuppets

Creating and using fake profiles (sockpuppets) on social media and forums to post content, comment, and interact as if they were real individuals. These accounts can be given fabricated identities, photos (often AI-generated or stolen), and posting histories to appear legitimate.

• Context: A single human operator can manage a handful of fake accounts. However, automation allows for the creation and management of thousands or even millions of these accounts simultaneously, making the network appear much larger and more influential than it is.
• Use Case: A network of fake accounts might all tweet the same hashtag or link within minutes of each other to make it trend, or fill comment sections on news articles with identical talking points to create the illusion of widespread public opinion.

3.2. Bots and Automated Amplification

The use of automated software scripts (bots) to perform tasks that mimic human online behavior but at a much larger scale and faster pace.

Definition: Bot (Internet Bot) An automated software program that runs tasks over the internet. Some bots are helpful (e.g., search engine crawlers), while others are malicious or used for manipulative purposes (e.g., spam bots, social bots).

Bots are crucial to the "Dead Internet" concept as they represent the non-human activity that saturates online spaces. In propaganda, bots are used for:

• Liking, Sharing, Retweeting: Artificially boosting the perceived popularity and reach of propaganda content.

• Automated Posting: Spreading messages across many platforms or groups rapidly.

• Spamming: Flooding discussions with repetitive messages to drown out opposing views or genuine conversation.

• Generating Fake Traffic: Making websites or articles appear more popular through artificial visits.

• Creating Follower Counts: Artificially inflating the number of followers for propagandists or their content to increase perceived authority.

• Example: A coordinated bot network could simultaneously share a misleading news article hundreds of thousands of times on Twitter and Facebook within minutes, making it appear organically viral and bypassing algorithmic filters that might detect single-source amplification.

3.3. Content Farms and Disinformation Sites

Websites or networks of sites that produce large volumes of low-quality, often sensationalized, or entirely fabricated news and articles designed to spread disinformation or propaganda. These sites are often monetized through advertising clicks, incentivizing sensationalism over truth.

• Context: While the content might be written by humans (sometimes low-paid workers), bots are often used to amplify this content by driving fake traffic to the sites or sharing articles widely on social media using fake accounts.
• Use Case: A network of linked "news" sites might publish slightly different versions of the same false story about a political candidate, and bots/fake accounts would share these links across various platforms to create the impression that multiple independent sources are reporting the same "fact."

3.4. Targeted Advertising and Microtargeting

Using data collected on users' online behavior, demographics, interests, and even psychological traits to deliver highly specific propaganda messages to small, carefully selected groups of people.

• Context: While advertising itself isn't propaganda, propaganda delivered via targeted advertising bypasses the general public sphere and reaches individuals in a personalized way, making it harder to fact-check publicly or for counter-narratives to reach the same audience. Automated data analysis and ad platforms are essential for this.
• Use Case: Showing anti-vaccine propaganda specifically to users who have searched for information about alternative health or joined certain online groups, while showing different messages to other demographics.

3.5. Deepfakes and Synthetic Media

Creating highly realistic but fabricated audio, video, or images using artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Definition: Deepfake A portmanteau of "deep learning" and "fake," referring to synthetic media in which a person's likeness is replaced by another person's likeness using artificial intelligence. This can also apply to audio and text.

• Context: While creating a deepfake requires significant AI processing power, the dissemination of these fakes relies heavily on the same automated networks used for other forms of propaganda (bots, fake accounts, rapid sharing) to ensure they spread widely before they can be debunked.
• Use Case: A fabricated video appearing to show a politician saying something controversial, spread rapidly by bot networks just before an election.

3.6. Trolling and Harassment Campaigns

Organized efforts, often utilizing fake accounts and bots, to overwhelm individuals or groups with abusive messages, threats, or relentless criticism to silence dissent or create a hostile online environment.

• Context: While human trolls exist, automated tools can generate vast numbers of harassing messages or coordinated reports against accounts to get them suspended, making these campaigns much harder to withstand.
• Use Case: A coordinated campaign using hundreds of bot-controlled accounts to send identical abusive messages to a journalist who published critical content, attempting to intimidate them into silence.

4. The Role of Bots and Automation: Fueling the "Dead Internet" Propaganda Machine

The "Dead Internet Files" theory posits that a large portion of the visible online world is automated. This automation isn't just a minor helper for propaganda; it's a fundamental enabler that transforms its potential and scale.

• Massive Scaling: Bots allow propagandists to operate at a scale previously unimaginable. A small team can exert the online "presence" of millions by controlling vast networks of automated accounts.
• Creating False Consensus: By simulating likes, shares, and comments, bots can make niche or unpopular views appear widely supported. This creates a false social proof that can influence undecided users, leading them to believe the propaganda is mainstream or accepted. This directly contributes to the "dead" feeling – observing massive, uncritical agreement that doesn't feel genuinely human.
• Drowning Out Opposition: Automated accounts can flood online discussions with propaganda, making it difficult for genuine users to share counter-arguments, ask critical questions, or even find reliable information. This information overload and manipulation make the online space feel less like a public square and more like a controlled environment.
• Evasion of Detection: Sophisticated bot networks are designed to mimic human behavior patterns imperfectly but sufficiently to evade detection algorithms. They can use diverse IP addresses, vary posting times, and mix in innocuous activity, making them hard to distinguish from real users, contributing to the uncanny nature of the "Dead Internet."
• Amplifying Speed: Bots enable propaganda to spread exponentially faster than human sharing alone. This speed is critical in influencing fast-moving events or dominating narratives before fact-checkers or counter-messages can gain traction.

The automated nature of modern online propaganda means that what appears as widespread online opinion, viral content, or trending discussion might be largely manufactured. This disconnect between perceived online activity and genuine human engagement is a core aspect of the "Dead Internet" phenomenon and highlights the challenges of navigating information in the digital age.

5. Who is Behind Online Propaganda?

Online propaganda campaigns are launched by various actors:

• State Actors: Governments use propaganda to influence their own populations, target adversaries, sow discord in other countries, or promote national interests.
• Political Parties and Campaigns: Use propaganda to attack opponents, promote their platform, and mobilize supporters.
• Activist Groups: May use propaganda to draw attention to their cause or demonize opponents.
• Corporations: Can use propaganda tactics (sometimes disguised as marketing or PR) to promote products, attack competitors, or manage their public image.
• Individuals: While less common at scale without automation, individuals or small groups can still spread propaganda.

Often, these actors leverage the services of specialized firms or use sophisticated technical infrastructure, including bot networks, to run their campaigns, making attribution difficult.

6. Impact and Consequences

The widespread use of online propaganda, amplified by automation and contributing to a "Dead Internet" environment, has significant consequences:

• Erosion of Trust: Constant exposure to manipulation erodes trust in media, institutions, and even other internet users.
• Political Polarization: Propaganda often exacerbates divisions by promoting extreme viewpoints and demonizing opposing groups.
• Manipulation of Democracy: Propaganda can influence election outcomes, referendums, and public policy by misinforming voters and suppressing participation.
• Real-World Harm: Disinformation about health (e.g., vaccines), safety (e.g., conspiracy theories), or social issues can lead to harmful behaviors, violence, and societal instability.
• Degradation of the Online Environment: The prevalence of automated, manipulative content makes genuine interaction harder to find and trust, contributing to the feeling that online spaces are less human and more controlled by unseen forces.

7. Identifying and Countering Online Propaganda

Navigating the online world requires critical digital literacy, especially given the potential for automated manipulation.

• Critical Evaluation: Question the source, check for bias, look for corroboration from reputable news organizations.
• Fact-Checking: Utilize dedicated fact-checking websites to verify dubious claims.
• Awareness of Tactics: Recognize common propaganda techniques (emotional appeals, ad hominem attacks, false urgency, cherry-picking data).
• Spotting Automation: Be suspicious of content or accounts that exhibit patterns suggestive of automation (e.g., rapid, repetitive posting; identical messages; unnaturally high engagement with low-quality content; generic profiles).
• Platform Responsibility: Social media platforms and other online services face the immense challenge of detecting and mitigating automated propaganda networks without infringing on legitimate speech. This is an ongoing technological arms race.
• Promoting Media Literacy: Educating individuals on how to critically assess online information is crucial.

8. Conclusion: Navigating the Automated Information Age

Online propaganda is a potent force, and its effectiveness has been dramatically enhanced by the rise of automation and bots – elements central to the "Dead Internet" perspective. The increasing difficulty in distinguishing genuine human activity from automated manipulation online poses a fundamental challenge to informed public discourse and democratic processes.

As online spaces become more saturated with content generated or amplified by non-human entities, understanding the methods and motivations behind online propaganda becomes paramount. It requires not only vigilance in evaluating the information we encounter but also an awareness of the underlying technological shifts that are reshaping our digital reality. Navigating the internet today means navigating an environment where the line between human expression and automated influence is increasingly blurred.